Does a module built on Didask export as SCORM to another LMS?

This isn't documented publicly. Didask explains in detail how to import existing SCORM content into its platform, and positions itself as SCORM 1.2 and 2004 compatible on the receiving end. But no page reviewed explicitly confirms that a course built on Didask exports as SCORM to a third-party LMS. A company that requires content portability should ask the question directly before signing, rather than assume it.

How much does Didask cost?

No public price list. The only figure available is a floor: "from €10,000/year," for an offer built case by case (Training, Coaching, or both). This is a mid-size or large company budget, not a self-service subscription.

Does my training data leave the European Union?

According to the page dedicated to the healthcare sector, data is hosted within the European Union, with end-to-end encryption and no outgoing flow, and the content created stays the client's property without being used to train a model. No HDS certification is mentioned, however, for use in a healthcare facility.

Do you need teaching skills to create a module?

No, that's the tool's central pitch: the engine combines a language model, code, and teaching rules to automatically apply principles like spaced repetition or active recall, without the content author needing to know them. It's still worth proofreading the result: the RAG limits invention, it doesn't remove it entirely.

What's the difference with a classic LMS like Docebo or 360Learning?

Docebo and 360Learning are first and foremost delivery and tracking platforms, with AI features layered on top. Didask starts from the other end: AI-driven course generation is the core of the product, delivery comes after. A company that mainly needs to manage an existing catalog should look at Docebo; one that wants to turn raw documents into structured training should look at Didask.

Didask: our review

Didask is a French training-creation platform that combines a language model, code, and teaching rules drawn from cognitive science to turn a source document into a structured course. It targets companies that train staff in-house and want to move past the plain PDF or the static video.

Data in the EUPaid·from €10000/yearFrench

Go to Didask's website

What we take away from it

What counts in its favor

Generation relies on a RAG that pulls content from your documents rather than letting the model make things up: fewer hallucinations than a tool that generates generic text from a plain prompt.
The teaching principles (spaced repetition, active recall, immediate feedback) are documented and named, not just promised in a marketing line.
Data hosted in the European Union, with no client content used to train a model, according to the page dedicated to the healthcare sector.

What counts against it

No pricing available without a quote: the only public figure is "from €10,000/year," a floor that immediately rules out small organizations.
SCORM export isn't documented anywhere as a capability of the product itself: Didask explains how to import existing SCORM content, but no page confirms that a module built on Didask exports as SCORM to another LMS.
No security certification (ISO 27001, SOC 2) is published: the security of the training platform itself is reserved for a sales demo.

A solid platform for a company that already has reference documents to turn into training, provided you accept a five-figure annual budget and check SCORM portability yourself before signing.

The facts

First paid tier: €10000/year — Starting from, custom-built offer (Training, Coaching, or both)
Data hosting: Data in the EU · source
Categories: Education and training
Data verified on: 30 July 2026
Integrations observed: Workday · Lucca · SAP SuccessFactors · Skillup

What happens to your data

Is your data used to train their models?
Subprocessors: Not detailed publicly for the training platform itself. The marketing website is hosted on Webflow, which has nothing to do with the hosting of clients' training data.
Retention: Not specified for training data. The legal-notice page states a 5-year retention period for the marketing site's contact data, a separate matter.

Didask in detail

Didask creates training modules from documents a company already has — procedures, regulatory PDFs, meeting recordings — rather than starting from a blank page. The vendor claims a method grounded in cognitive science, not just AI text generation.

What it actually does

You upload a source document: PDF, video, transcript. Didask extracts its content through RAG — retrieval-augmented generation — to build a multi-step "teaching graph," rather than letting a language model improvise from a plain prompt. The engine combines, in the vendor's own words, "LLM + code + teaching rules": documented principles such as spaced repetition, active recall, or feedback given exactly when the learner needs it are applied automatically to the module's structure, not left to the randomness of generation.

Why it interests us for corporate training

The cognitive-science angle sets Didask apart from quiz generators that turn a text into questions with no regard for actual retention. For a company that already has hundreds of pages of internal procedures and wants to turn them into something teams actually remember, this is a concrete use of AI more defensible than a simple automatic summary. A training project that relies on this kind of tool benefits from clarifying upfront what the company really expects: distributing an existing catalog, or turning raw documentation into a structured course. These are two different needs, and Didask answers the second.

Where it falls short

Three points to check before signing. Price, first: the only public figure is a floor of €10,000 a year, with no detailed price list — a budget for an already-organized organization, not a subscription to test on a whim. Then, portability: Didask documents in detail how to import existing SCORM content, but no page reviewed confirms that a module built on the platform exports itself as SCORM to a third-party LMS. For an organization that sets portability as a contractual condition, this point deserves a written question before signing, not an assumption. Lastly, no formal security certification is published: the full technical documentation stays reserved for a sales demo.

Our recommendation

Didask suits a company that already has material to transform — documentation, procedures, recordings — and a structured annual training budget. A small organization on a tight budget, or a training body that must contractually guarantee SCORM export to another LMS, should ask the vendor directly before taking the tool for granted.

Who it's for, and who it isn't

Suited for

Company that already has business documents (procedures, regulations) and wants to turn them into interactive modules rather than have them read as a PDF
Training department with a five-figure annual budget that wants a tailor-made program rather than a self-service subscription
Organization that wants to keep its training data within the European Union

Not a fit

Small organization or freelancer looking for a tool costing a few tens of euros a month
Training organization that must contractually guarantee SCORM export to a third-party LMS before choosing a publisher
Team that wants to test the tool alone with no support, before any budget commitment

Frequently asked questions

Does a module built on Didask export as SCORM to another LMS?: This isn't documented publicly. Didask explains in detail how to import existing SCORM content into its platform, and positions itself as SCORM 1.2 and 2004 compatible on the receiving end. But no page reviewed explicitly confirms that a course built on Didask exports as SCORM to a third-party LMS. A company that requires content portability should ask the question directly before signing, rather than assume it.
How much does Didask cost?: No public price list. The only figure available is a floor: "from €10,000/year," for an offer built case by case (Training, Coaching, or both). This is a mid-size or large company budget, not a self-service subscription.
Does my training data leave the European Union?: According to the page dedicated to the healthcare sector, data is hosted within the European Union, with end-to-end encryption and no outgoing flow, and the content created stays the client's property without being used to train a model. No HDS certification is mentioned, however, for use in a healthcare facility.
Do you need teaching skills to create a module?: No, that's the tool's central pitch: the engine combines a language model, code, and teaching rules to automatically apply principles like spaced repetition or active recall, without the content author needing to know them. It's still worth proofreading the result: the RAG limits invention, it doesn't remove it entirely.
What's the difference with a classic LMS like Docebo or 360Learning?: Docebo and 360Learning are first and foremost delivery and tracking platforms, with AI features layered on top. Didask starts from the other end: AI-driven course generation is the core of the product, delivery comes after. A company that mainly needs to manage an existing catalog should look at Docebo; one that wants to turn raw documents into structured training should look at Didask.