Crisp: our review
Crisp brings together site chat, email, WhatsApp, and social media in a single inbox, backed by an AI agent. The vendor, a French company based in Nantes, is one of the few in the sector to publicly document European hosting of its data.
What we take away from it
What counts in its favor
- Its privacy policy documents European hosting (Amsterdam) for the main infrastructure, in terms that stay a stated preference — "we favor," "as much as possible" — rather than a contractual commitment, a level of detail its competitors, often American, don't document as clearly.
- Billed per workspace, not per agent: adding colleagues up to the tier's cap doesn't change the bill, unlike most tools in the sector.
- Permanent free tier with two seats and a chat widget, usable indefinitely and not just as a trial.
- Hugo, the AI agent, according to the vendor never trains its own model on customer data, and only passes on to LLM providers the context needed for each request.
What counts against it
- Hugo AI relies on third-party LLM providers, including OpenAI according to the documentation: the European hosting promise therefore doesn't systematically cover AI calls, which can pass outside the Union.
- Neither ISO 27001 nor SOC 2 is certified by an external audit: Crisp itself says it is "committed to aligning" with ISO 27001, and acknowledges it has never passed a formal SOC 2 audit.
- Billing in dollars per workspace: a company managing several distinct brands or sites has to multiply subscriptions rather than pool seats under one.
A solid choice for a French SMB that wants to centralize its customer relations without depending on an American giant, provided it accepts the lack of formal certification and the share of AI that passes through third parties.
The facts
- First paid tier
- $45/month — Mini, per workspace
- Data hosting
- Data in the EU · source
- Categories
- Customer service
- Data verified on
- 30 July 2026
- Integrations observed
- Shopify · WordPress · Slack · HubSpot · Zapier · Salesforce
What happens to your data
- Is your data used to train their models?
- Subprocessors
- A list of subprocessors is published and can be viewed from the privacy policy. Hugo AI calls on third-party LLM providers (including OpenAI, cited as an example) to generate its replies; the vendor states that these providers don't store the data or use it to train their own model by default.
- Retention
- Account data is deleted on request, or after twelve months of inactivity unless reactivated. Contracts are kept per legal obligations, and technical logs for one year at most.
Crisp in detail
Crisp brings together site chat, email, WhatsApp, Instagram, and other social media into a single inbox, backed by an AI agent named Hugo. The vendor, Crisp IM SAS, is based in Nantes — a rare address in a customer-support market dominated by American companies.
What it actually does
A widget placed on the site captures visitor messages, which land in a shared inbox where the whole team replies, whatever the originating channel. Hugo can answer repetitive questions on its own by relying on a knowledge base written by the company, and pass the rest to a human operator. Paid tiers add AI-driven flow automation, an omnichannel chatbot, and a ticketing system to track requests over time.
Billing follows a simple principle: a fixed price per workspace, not per conversation or per agent up to the tier's cap. A four-person micro-business therefore pays the same Mini rate as a team of three, as long as it stays under the included seat limit.
Why it particularly interests us
The argument that sets Crisp apart from its direct competitors fits in one line of its privacy policy: data is stored in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and the vendor states it wants to avoid any avoidable transfer. That's a level of detail neither Intercom nor Zendesk displays as clearly. For a French firm or SMB that wants to keep its customer conversations in Europe without building its own infrastructure, that's a weighty criterion — see our customer relations page to compare other options on the market.
The vendor adds that its AI model is never trained with customer data, a commitment few support tools state as explicitly.
Where it falls short
Three reservations before committing. The first concerns Hugo: the AI agent calls on third-party model providers, including OpenAI according to the vendor's documentation, to generate certain replies. The promise of European hosting therefore covers the main infrastructure, not necessarily every AI call — a point worth checking if professional secrecy applies to your exchanges.
The second concerns certifications. Crisp mentions ISO 27001 and SOC 2 in its help center, but itself acknowledges it hasn't passed a formal SOC 2 audit, and says only that it is "committed to aligning" with ISO 27001. A company that needs a certificate for its own client audits won't find anything to produce here.
The third is more practical: billing is done in dollars, per workspace. An organization managing several brands or sites under distinct identities will have to multiply subscriptions rather than pool its seats under one.
Our recommendation
For a French micro or small business that wants to centralize its customer relations without depending on a typical American service, Crisp remains a solid choice, backed by a commitment to European hosting that's rare in this sector. Look elsewhere if your business requires a documented ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification, or if any data transfer outside the EU — even for an optional AI feature — is a red line for you.
Who it's for, and who it isn't
Suited for
- French micro and small businesses that want to gather chat, email, and social media in a single inbox, without writing code
- An organization just starting its customer support and wanting a permanent free tier rather than a time-limited trial
Not a fit
- Company subject to formal audit requirements (ISO 27001, SOC 2) to justify its own certifications to its clients
- Organization that refuses any data transfer outside the European Union, including for optional AI features like Hugo
Frequently asked questions
- Is Crisp's data really hosted in Europe?
- Yes for the main infrastructure: Crisp's privacy policy states that data is stored in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. An exception exists for Hugo, the AI agent, which can pass a conversation's context to a third-party model provider like OpenAI.
- Does Hugo, Crisp's AI agent, use my conversations to train itself?
- No, according to the vendor: Crisp states it never trains its own model on customer data, and specifies that the LLM providers Hugo calls on don't retain the data they receive or use it for their own training by default.
- Is Crisp certified ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
- No, not in the sense of a formal external audit. The vendor says it is "committed to aligning" with ISO 27001 requirements, and itself acknowledges never having had its SOC 2 practices certified by an auditor.
- How much does Crisp cost for a ten-person team?
- The Essentials tier at $95/month includes ten seats for a single workspace; beyond that, each additional agent costs $10/month. Prices shown don't include VAT.
- What's the difference with Intercom or Zendesk?
- Intercom and Zendesk most often bill per agent and document their server locations less precisely. Crisp bills per workspace and states European hosting in its privacy policy — a point its two competitors don't detail as clearly.
Alternatives to Crisp
Customer service
Intercom
Has an AI agent answer common customer questions and hands unresolved cases to a human.
Customer service
Zendesk
Automatically routes and resolves part of support tickets with an AI agent trained on the company's history.
Customer service
Freshdesk
Centralizes multichannel support tickets and suggests replies to the agent using AI.
Our sources
- Privacy policyaccessed on 30 July 2026
- Pricing pageaccessed on 30 July 2026
- Security of Crisp services (help center)accessed on 30 July 2026
- SOC 2 compliance statusaccessed on 30 July 2026
- ISO 27001 complianceaccessed on 30 July 2026
Prices and hosting terms change often. We recheck them periodically, but the publisher's page remains the only up-to-date reference.