Skip to main content
nexeai
Rankings

Which language models are actually used, and what for

The leading models for each task, in the order OpenRouter ranks them from the traffic going through its gateway. No score of ours: we show that ranking as it is, without re-sorting it.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

Most present

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

in the top 8 of 12 out of 12 tasks

Top-scoring paid model

Claude Opus 5.5

index 59.1, $4 per million tokens

Cheapest paid number one

$0.051

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, leading in Translation

Window ≥ 128k

91 %

of models declaring a window

Tool calling

87 %

of models declare it

New models

306

joined the catalogue in twelve months

By task

The leading models for each task, in the order OpenRouter ranks them. The figure on the right is the input price, in dollars per million tokens.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ranks near the top in 12 of 12 tasks

One row per model found in at least two tasks. Each cell gives its rank in the task, bluer the higher it ranks. Ranks counted after removing OpenRouter's dynamic routers.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ranks near the top in 12 of 12 tasksDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 12 tasks ; GLM 5.3 Flash: 12 tasks ; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 11 tasks ; GPT-6 Luna: 11 tasks ; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 7 tasks ; MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 7 tasks ; GPT-5.6 Luna: 6 tasks ; Claude Haiku 5.5: 5 tasks ; GPT-6.1 Sol: 5 tasks ; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: 2 tasksProgrammingTechnologyScienceResearchMarketingSEOTranslationLegalFinanceHealthRoleplayGeneral knowledgeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1…111132231411GLM 5.3 Flash332821563357DeepSeek V4.1 Flash22544DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — SEO : not ranked142624GPT-6 Luna6443183251GPT-6 Luna — Roleplay : not ranked5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 — Programming : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 — Technology : not ranked6DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 — Research : not ranked8DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 — SEO : not ranked68DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 — Finance : not ranked862MiniMax M3.1 Flash8676MiniMax M3.1 Flash — Marketing : not ranked6MiniMax M3.1 Flash — Translation : not rankedMiniMax M3.1 Flash — Legal : not ranked8MiniMax M3.1 Flash — Health : not rankedMiniMax M3.1 Flash — Roleplay : not ranked8GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna — Programming : not rankedGPT-5.6 Luna — Technology : not rankedGPT-5.6 Luna — Science : not ranked26GPT-5.6 Luna — SEO : not ranked8175GPT-5.6 Luna — Roleplay : not rankedGPT-5.6 Luna — General knowledge : not rankedClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 — Programming : not rankedClaude Haiku 5.5 — Technology : not rankedClaude Haiku 5.5 — Science : not rankedClaude Haiku 5.5 — Research : not ranked5577Claude Haiku 5.5 — Finance : not ranked2Claude Haiku 5.5 — Roleplay : not rankedClaude Haiku 5.5 — General knowledge : not rankedGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol — Programming : not ranked58573GPT-6.1 Sol — Translation : not rankedGPT-6.1 Sol — Legal : not rankedGPT-6.1 Sol — Finance : not rankedGPT-6.1 Sol — Health : not rankedGPT-6.1 Sol — Roleplay : not rankedGPT-6.1 Sol — General knowledge : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Programming : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Technology : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Science : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Research : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Marketing : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — SEO : not ranked4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Legal : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Finance : not rankedDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — Health : not ranked3DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 — General knowledge : not ranked
Chart data
ModelProgrammingTechnologyScienceResearchMarketingSEOTranslationLegalFinanceHealthRoleplayGeneral knowledge
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017111132231411
GLM 5.3 Flash332821563357
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash22544—142624
GPT-6 Luna6443183251—5
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731——6—8—68—862
MiniMax M3.1 Flash8676—6——8——8
GPT-5.6 Luna———26—8175——
Claude Haiku 5.5————5577—2——
GPT-6.1 Sol—58573——————
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423——————4———3—

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

Each task's number one costs between $0.051 and $0.2 per million input tokens

For each task, the bar runs from the cheapest to the most expensive leading model; the blue dot is the number one, its price written on the right. Logarithmic scale.

Each task's number one costs between $0.051 and $0.2 per million input tokensProgramming: number one at $0.15 ; Technology: number one at $0.15 ; Science: number one at $0.15 ; Research: number one at $0.15 ; Marketing: number one at $0.1 ; SEO: number one at $0.15 ; Translation: number one at $0.051 ; Legal: number one at $0.2 ; Finance: number one at $0.15 ; Health: number one at $0.1 ; Roleplay: number one at $0.15 ; General knowledge: number one at $0.15$0.01$0.1$1$10Programming$0.15Technology$0.15Science$0.15Research$0.15Marketing$0.1SEO$0.15Translation$0.051Legal$0.2Finance$0.15Health$0.1Roleplay$0.15General knowledge$0.15
Chart data
Task12345678
Programming$0.15$0.051$0.15$1$0.1$0.1$2$0.15
Technology$0.15$0.051$0.15$0.1$2$0.15$0.07$4
Science$0.15$0.15$0.1$0.1$0.051$0.043$0.15$2
Research$0.15$0.2$0.1$0.051$2$0.15$0.2$0.15
Marketing$0.1$0.15$0.15$0.051$0.1$0.2$2$0.043
SEO$0.15$0.15$2$1.75$0.1$0.15$0.75$0.1
Translation$0.051$0.15$0.1$0.091$0.15$0.043$0.1$0.2
Legal$0.2$0.1$0.15$0.051$0.15$0.15$0.1$0.043
Finance$0.15$0.051$0.15$0.14$0.1$4$0.2$0.15
Health$0.1$0.1$0.15$0.15$0.2$0.051$0.25$0.043
Roleplay$0.15$0.051$0.091$0.83$0.15$0.043$0.44$0.75
General knowledge$0.15$0.043$2$0.051$0.1$0.11$0.15$0.15

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

Best LLMs for programming

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  3. 3.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  4. 4.Step 5 Previewby StepFun1.00
  5. 5.Muse Spark 1.3 Contributorby Meta0.10
  6. 6.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  7. 7.Kimi K3.1 Proby MoonshotAI2.00
  8. 8.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15

Best LLMs for technical work

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  3. 3.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  4. 4.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  5. 5.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI2.00
  6. 6.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15
  7. 7.GLM 5.3by Z.ai0.07
  8. 8.Claude Opus 5.5by Anthropic4.00

Best LLMs for science

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  3. 3.Muse Spark 1.3 Contributorby Meta0.10
  4. 4.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  5. 5.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  6. 6.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04
  7. 7.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15
  8. 8.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI2.00

Best LLMs for academic research

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.GPT-5.6 Lunaby OpenAI0.20
  3. 3.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  4. 4.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  5. 5.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI2.00
  6. 6.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15
  7. 7.GPT-5.4 Nanoby OpenAI0.20
  8. 8.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15

Best LLMs for marketing

  1. 1.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  2. 2.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  3. 3.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  4. 4.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  5. 5.Claude Haiku 5.5by Anthropic0.10
  6. 6.GPT-5.6 Lunaby OpenAI0.20
  7. 7.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI2.00
  8. 8.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04

Best LLMs for search engine optimisation

  1. 1.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  3. 3.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI2.00
  4. 4.GPT-5.2by OpenAI1.75
  5. 5.Claude Haiku 5.5by Anthropic0.10
  6. 6.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15
  7. 7.Gemini 3.8 Flashby Google0.75
  8. 8.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10

Best LLMs for translation

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  3. 3.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  4. 4.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423by DeepSeek0.09
  5. 5.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  6. 6.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04
  7. 7.Claude Haiku 5.5by Anthropic0.10
  8. 8.GPT-5.6 Lunaby OpenAI0.20

Best LLMs for finance

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  3. 3.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  4. 4.MiMo-V2.6-Flashby Xiaomi0.14
  5. 5.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  6. 6.Claude Opus 5.5by Anthropic4.00
  7. 7.GPT-5.6 Lunaby OpenAI0.20
  8. 8.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15

Best LLMs for healthcare

  1. 1.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  2. 2.Claude Haiku 5.5by Anthropic0.10
  3. 3.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  4. 4.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  5. 5.GPT-5.6 Lunaby OpenAI0.20
  6. 6.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  7. 7.Gemini 3.1 Flash Liteby Google0.25
  8. 8.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04

Best LLMs for roleplay

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  3. 3.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423by DeepSeek0.09
  4. 4.Hy4 previewby Tencent0.83
  5. 5.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  6. 6.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04
  7. 7.MiMo-V2.6-Proby Xiaomi0.44
  8. 8.Gemini 3.8 Flashby Google0.75

Best LLMs for general knowledge

  1. 1.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017by DeepSeek0.15
  2. 2.DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731by DeepSeek0.04
  3. 3.Gemini 4 Argonby Google2.00
  4. 4.DeepSeek V4.1 Flashby DeepSeek0.05
  5. 5.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI0.10
  6. 6.DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813by DeepSeek0.11
  7. 7.GLM 5.3 Flashby Z.ai0.15
  8. 8.MiniMax M3.1 Flashby MiniMax0.15

By capability

The same catalogue, sorted this time on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index, which OpenRouter publishes for some of the models. Compare it with the lists above: the two rankings do not always match.

GPT-6.1 Sol comes within 4.5 points of Claude Opus 5.5 at a price 2 times lower

The 20 highest-scoring paid models: Artificial Analysis intelligence index against input price, one variant per model; the top scorer in solid blue. Price on a logarithmic scale.

GPT-6.1 Sol comes within 4.5 points of Claude Opus 5.5 at a price 2 times lowerClaude Opus 5.5: index 59.1, $4 ; GPT-6 Astra: index 56.9, $10 ; GPT-6.1 Sol: index 54.6, $2 ; Claude Sonnet 5.5: index 54.5, $2 ; GPT-6.1 Terra: index 51.3, $1 ; Gemini 4 Argon: index 50.4, $2 ; Claude Fable 5.1: index 50, $10 ; Kimi K3.1 Pro: index 46.5, $2 ; GPT-6 Sol: index 44.2, $2 ; Claude Opus 5: index 44.2, $5 ; Muse Wonder: index 43.6, $4 ; Muse Spark 1.3: index 36.6, $1.25 ; Claude Haiku 5.5: index 36.5, $0.1 ; Grok 4.7: index 35.5, $2 ; Hy4: index 34.6, $0.42 ; Qwen3.8 Max (0902): index 33.7, $2 ; GPT-5.6 Terra: index 32.3, $2 ; GLM 5.3: index 31.7, $0.07 ; Grok 4.6: index 31, $2 ; Gemini 3.8 Flash: index 30.8, $0.8330405060$0.01$0.1$1$10Input price, dollars per million tokensIntelligence indexGemini 3.8 Flash — 30.8 · $0.83Grok 4.6 — 31 · $2GLM 5.3 — 31.7 · $0.07GPT-5.6 Terra — 32.3 · $2Qwen3.8 Max (0902) — 33.7 · $2Hy4 — 34.6 · $0.42Grok 4.7 — 35.5 · $2Claude Haiku 5.5 — 36.5 · $0.1Muse Spark 1.3 — 36.6 · $1.25Muse Wonder — 43.6 · $4Claude Opus 5 — 44.2 · $5GPT-6 Sol — 44.2 · $2Kimi K3.1 Pro — 46.5 · $2Claude Fable 5.1 — 50 · $10Gemini 4 Argon — 50.4 · $2GPT-6.1 Terra — 51.3 · $1GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Sonnet 5.5 — 54.5 · $2Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol — 54.6 · $2GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra — 56.9 · $10GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 — 59.1 · $4Claude Opus 5.5
Chart data
ModelIndexInput price
Claude Opus 5.559.1$4
GPT-6 Astra56.9$10
GPT-6.1 Sol54.6$2
Claude Sonnet 5.554.5$2
GPT-6.1 Terra51.3$1
Gemini 4 Argon50.4$2
Claude Fable 5.150$10
Kimi K3.1 Pro46.5$2
GPT-6 Sol44.2$2
Claude Opus 544.2$5
Muse Wonder43.6$4
Muse Spark 1.336.6$1.25
Claude Haiku 5.536.5$0.1
Grok 4.735.5$2
Hy434.6$0.42
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)33.7$2
GPT-5.6 Terra32.3$2
GLM 5.331.7$0.07
Grok 4.631$2
Gemini 3.8 Flash30.8$0.83

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

  1. 1.Claude Opus 5.5by Anthropic59.1
  2. 2.GPT-6 Astraby OpenAI56.9
  3. 3.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI54.6
  4. 4.Claude Sonnet 5.5by Anthropic54.5
  5. 5.GPT-6.1 Terraby OpenAI51.3
  6. 6.Gemini 4 Argonby Google50.4
  7. 7.Claude Fable 5.1by Anthropic50
  8. 8.Kimi K3.1 Proby MoonshotAI46.5
  9. 9.GPT-6 Solby OpenAI44.2
  10. 10.Claude Opus 5by Anthropic44.2

Artificial Analysis index, published by OpenRouter

By context window

How much text a model holds in view at once. It decides the size of the file you can hand it in one go: a contract, a set of accounts, a codebase.

91% of the catalogue accepts at least 128,000 tokens

Number of models by context window size, out of 453 models. Declared capability, not actual usage.

91% of the catalogue accepts at least 128,000 tokens< 32k: 13 ; 32 – 128k: 27 ; 128 – 256k: 98 ; 256k – 1M: 118 ; ≥ 1M: 19713< 32k2732 – 128k98128 – 256k118256k – 1M197≥ 1M

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

  1. 1.Grok 4.20 Multi-Agentby SpaceXAI2 M
  2. 2.Grok 4.20by SpaceXAI2 M
  3. 3.Llama 4 Scoutby Meta1.3 M
  4. 4.GPT-6.1 Terra Proby OpenAI1.1 M
  5. 5.GPT-6.1 Terraby OpenAI1.1 M
  6. 6.GPT-6.1 Sol Proby OpenAI1.1 M
  7. 7.GPT-6.1 Solby OpenAI1.1 M
  8. 8.GPT-6 Luna Proby OpenAI1.1 M
  9. 9.GPT-6 Lunaby OpenAI1.1 M
  10. 10.GPT-6 Sol Proby OpenAI1.1 M

Context window, in tokens

What the models can do

The capabilities the catalogue's models declare. This is what they accept, not what is actually used.

87% of the catalogue's models declare tool calling

Share of the 453 models declaring each capability; a model can tick several.

87% of the catalogue's models declare tool callingTool calling: 87% ; Image input: 68% ; Reasoning mode: 75%Tool calling87 %Image input68 %Reasoning mode75 %

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

New models

The pace at which new models join the OpenRouter catalogue.

306 models joined the catalogue in twelve months, 58 of them in September 2026

Models by month of entry into the catalogue, over the last twelve full months. Only models still in the catalogue are counted.

306 models joined the catalogue in twelve months, 58 of them in September 2026November 2025: 8 ; December 2025: 21 ; January 2026: 7 ; February 2026: 21 ; March 2026: 20 ; April 2026: 36 ; May 2026: 13 ; June 2026: 18 ; July 2026: 34 ; August 2026: 36 ; September 2026: 58 ; October 2026: 340204060November 2025: 88NovDecember 2025: 2121DecJanuary 2026: 77JanFebruary 2026: 2121FebMarch 2026: 2020MarApril 2026: 3636AprMay 2026: 1313MayJune 2026: 1818JunJuly 2026: 3434JulAugust 2026: 3636AugSeptember 2026: 5858SeptOctober 2026: 3434Oct
Chart data
MonthModels
November 20258
December 202521
January 20267
February 202621
March 202620
April 202636
May 202613
June 202618
July 202634
August 202636
September 202658
October 202634

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), retrieved on 8 November 2026.

What this ranking measures, and what it does not

Method

What is counted
Traffic routed through the OpenRouter API. We show the models in the order its API returns for each task, without re-sorting; on its rankings page, OpenRouter states that tasks are ranked by share of spend. Its datasets only cover public traffic: private models, private endpoints and zero-data-retention traffic are excluded at the source.
What it does not say
Neither accuracy nor reasoning quality. Rank also follows the price and verbosity of models, not only their results. That is what the “By capability” section is for.
The scope
Traffic through OpenRouter, not the whole market. A model used heavily on its own vendor's API appears lower here than it deserves.
Freshness
The page re-reads itself once a day. The date shown is the date of the reading, not of the deployment.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), retrieved on 8 November 2026. Rankings licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Picking a model is the last question, not the first

What decides an agent is the work it is given, the data it touches and where it runs. The model itself changes in one line. Let's talk about the rest.